Robert Gates blew the whistle on CIA support for Moslem extremists.If 9 11 was an inside job, there would be lots of whistleblowers.
And there are lots of whistleblowers.
1. Zbigniew Brzezinski, revealed to Le Nouvel Observateur, in 1998, that the CIA had been supporting Moslem extremists since 1979. (Zbigniew Brzezinski - Wikipedia)2. Robert Gates, the former director of the CIA, stated in his memoirs "From the Shadows", that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan in 1979, six months before the Soviet intervention.
In fact the CIA has been using Moslem extremists to do its dirty work since around 1955.
That was when the CIA began to co-operate with the Moslem Brotherhood. The CIA and MI6 used the Moslem Brotherhood to weaken, and try to control, Egypt, Syria and Iran.
(The British, Muslim Terrorism and September 11)In the 1960s, MI6 supported Islamic guerrillas in Indonesia. According to The Independent (UK): "Cabinet papers show that British spies, including MI6, supported Islamic guerrillas in order to destabilise Sukarno."
(The Secret State: MI5 (Home Office/MoD), The Security Service and ...).Islamic extremists were used by the CIA to break up Yugoslavia and to destabilise Chechnya. (THE CIA'S USE OF MILITANT MOSLEMS OVER A PERIOD OF 50 YEARS)3. People within French intelligence blew the whistle. According to French state radio and Le Figaro newspaper, Osama bin Laden was admitted to the American hospital in Dubai on 4 July 2001. Osama met the CIA's Larry Mitchell at the American hospital. The whistleblowers were French intelligence.
According to The Guardian: "The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere." (CIA agent met Bin Laden in July.)
On Sept 10, 2001, Osama had kidney dialysis at a Pakistani military hospital in which a "secret team" replaced regular urology staff. (CBS).
Historian Daniele Ganser was the whistleblower in the case of The Bologna Bombing 1980 - Classic State Terrorism
4. Greg Palast revealed Osama bin Laden's connections to the Bush family. (BBC News NEWSNIGHT Greg Palast report transcript - 6/11/01)
According to Palast: "The younger Bush made his first million 20 years ago with an oil company partly funded by Salem Bin Laden's chief US representative."
And, both the bin Ladens and the Bush family have invested in the Carlyle group, one of Americas biggest defence contractors.
Palast received a phone call from a high-placed member of a US intelligence agency who reported that the intelligence agencies were told to "back off" investigating the Bin Ladens.
On 9 11 2001 , 'Frank Carlucci of the Carlyle group was involved in a meeting with representatives of the bin Laden family'.
5. Sudan's minister of defense, Fatih Erwa, has claimed that Sudan offered to hand Bin Ladin over to the United States.
6. Michael Springman blew the whistle on the issuing of US visas to various Moslems. (BBC News NEWSNIGHT Greg Palast report transcript - 6/11/01):
Springman said: "In Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Dept officials to issue visas to unqualified applicants...
"What I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits, rounded up by Osama Bin Laden, to the US for terrorist training by the CIA..."
7. A former pilot revealed that the airfield at Venice Florida, where Mohamed Atta learnt to fly, had long been used for CIA operations. (Daniel Hopsicker -MadCowMorningNews)
8. Newsweek revealed that five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers received training at secure US military bases. (MSNBC)
"Terrorists in the September 11 attacks received training at secure US military bases, a Defense Department spokesman admitted in an interview Friday."
Three days after the WTC disaster, Newsweek and the Washington Post reported that 3 of the hijackers had listed their address as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Florida.
The BBC blew the whistle on its own 'involvement' in 9 11.
9. Employees of SunCruz Casinos reported that three 9-11 'hijackers' were seen aboard Jack Abramoff's casino ship.
The Associated Press story on Sept 26, 2001 was headlined SunCruz Casinos turns over documents in terrorist probe.
"SunCruz Casinos has turned over photographs and other documents to FBI investigators after employees said they recognized some of the men suspected in the terrorist attacks as customers.… Names on the passenger list from a Sept. 5 cruise matched those of some of the hijackers..." (aangirfan: Abramoff and 9 11)
10. Several of the hijackers acted as whistleblowers.
The BBC reported that a number of the 9 11 'hijackers' were still alive after 9 11. (BBC NEWS Middle East Hijack 'suspects' alive and well)
23 September 2001: "Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September...
"Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
"He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened...
"Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted (as alive) in Arab news reports...
"Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi...
"And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive."
11. The National Security Archive blew the whistle on Operation Northwoods, the 1962 Pentagon plan to commit acts of terrorism within the USA. (9 11 REVEALED - The Daily Mail / Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia)
The previously secret Northwoods document was originally made public on November 18, 1997.
"In the Pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.
"The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names. The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft.
"Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret."
12. voltairenet.org/en reported that a surprising number of the passengers on Flight AA77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon, had military connections.
Voltairenet's information is from Strategie per una guerra mondiale, a book by Pino Cabras.
13. 'Rogue trader' Jerome Kerviel worked for the French bank Societe Generale and he has reported that certain bankers made lots of money on 9 11, presumably because they knew in advance about the 9 11 attacks.
(SocGen rogue trader Jerome Kerviel 'hit the jackpot' on 7/7 ... / 'Rogue trader' Jerome Kerviel.)
According to Kerviel, "The best trading day in the history of Société Générale was September 11, 2001."
(aangirfan: BANKERS MADE MONEY FROM 9 11 and 7 7)
A number of transactions in the financial markets indicated foreknowledge of the 9 11 attacks.
In the case of at least one of these trades, the firm used to place the "put options" on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, a top man at the CIA. (Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading.)
14. Frank de Martini, the World Trade Centre's construction manager, said "We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners."
15. Former Pakistani foreign minister Niaz Niak said in July 2001 that the US had decided to attack Afghanistan by October 2001.
More 9 11 Whistleblowers? are listed by Paul Joseph Watson of
Propaganda Matrix, on 27 September 2010:
16. FBI translator
Sibel Edmonds went public last year to reveal that Bin Laden maintained "intimate" relations with the US right up until 9/11.
17. Former US army Sergeant Lauro Chavez. was stationed at MacDill AFB where he claims he witnessed preparations for a potential airplane hitting the base on the morning of 9/11 and distinctly heard officers talking about a stand down.
This led him to go public in questioning the NORAD stand down and the demolition of the twin towers.
18. The fact
that the BBC, CNN and others reported the collapse of WTC 7 before it fell was a form of blowing the whistle.
19. First responders and firefighters have gone on record to say they saw and heard bombs tear down both Building 7 and the twin towers.
Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer was in the immediate vicinity of Building 7 before its collapse at approximately 5:20pm:
"The whole time you're hearing 'boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.' I think I know an explosion when I hear it..."
20. Some people were also told that Building 7 was to be deliberately demolished,
including Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh - another whistleblower.
21. Mike wrote in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were told Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.
“There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see them through the windows…and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally pulled… they told us,” he stated.
22. Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue,
Kevin McPadden, said that he heard the last few seconds of the countdown on a nearby police radio.
23. A
dentist who met the alleged 9/11 hijackers before the attacks and warned the FBI
was later poisoned to death.
24. A 9/11
toxic dust whistleblower, a ground zero hero and one of the individuals influential in the release of documents proving a government cover-up that deliberately put police, firemen and rescue personnel at risk,
was raided by a New York SWAT team - who ransacked his home for three hours after he was arrested.
25. The
many prominent military, government, scientific and legal officials who have all questioned the official 9/11 story are in their own right expert whistleblowers, and all to some extent have questioned or dismissed the official account.
9/11 COMMISSIONERS
The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton)
said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”.
The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said that
the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).
Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that
the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.
9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says
“I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only “the first draft” of history.
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that
“There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said
“We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating:
“It is a national scandal”;
“This investigation is now compromised”; and
“One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.
9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “
We purposely put together a staff that had – in a way – conflicts of interest“.
The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said
“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”CONGRESSAccording to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham,
a U.S. government informant was the landlord to two of the hijackers for over a year (but the White House refused to let the 9/11 inquiry interview him).
Current U.S. Senator (Patrick Leahy) states
“The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”Current Republican Congressman (Ron Paul)
calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that
“we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”Current Democratic Congressman (Dennis Kucinich)
hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11Former Democratic Senator (Mike Gravel) states that
he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11Former Republican Senator (Lincoln Chaffee)
endorses a new 9/11 investigationFormer U.S. Democratic Congressman (Dan Hamburg) says that
the U.S. government “assisted” in the 9/11 attacks, stating that “I think there was a lot of help from the inside”Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee (Curt Weldon) has shown that the
U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that
9/11 was an inside job.
MILITARY LEADERSDeputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that
the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt” (
bio)
Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that
9/11 was an inside job.
He also said:
“
If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot-I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to-if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!“
U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated:
“there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control … Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a ‘conspiracy Theory’ does not change the truth. It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the State.’ “President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which
doubts the government’s version of 9/11U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said
“We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time.”Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official (Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski)
finds various aspects of 9/11 suspiciousLieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said
“Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.”Two-Star general (Major General Albert Stubbelbine)
questions the attack on the PentagonU.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer)
said the following:
“I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government ….
Those of us in the military took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.
We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!”
U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career (Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford)
believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said:
“This isn’t about party, it isn’t about Bush Bashing. It’s about our country, our constitution, and our future. …
Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.
If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or … to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? ….
Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can’t handle it? …”
U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot (Commander Ralph Kolstad) who questions the official account of 9/11 and is calling for a new investigation, says
“When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story”.
The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that
President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibilityAdditionally, numerous military leaders from allied governments have questioned 9/11, such as:
Canadian Minister of Defense, the top military leader of Canada (Paul Hellyer)
Assistant German Defense Minister (Andreas Von Bulow)
Commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy (Anatoli Kornukov)
Chief of staff of the Russian armed forces (General Leonid Ivashov)
INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALSFormer military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg recently said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is “
far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers“.
He also said that the government is
ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that
some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath.A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “
I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.
A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “
I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11.” (and see
this).
20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer (David Steele) stated that
“9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war”, and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).
A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that
“the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job .
The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “
The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup.”
Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency, former military attaché in China, with a 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army)
questions the government’s version of the events of 9/11.The head of all U.S. intelligence, the
Director of National Intelligence (Mike McConnel) said
“9/11 should have and could have been prevented”A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about
“serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored).
SCIENTISTSA prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed
“does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolitionA world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National Medal of Science, America’s highest honor for scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said:
“
I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken.“
The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere),
called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.”The principal electrical engineer for the entire World Trade Center complex, who was “very familiar with the structures and [the Twin Towers'] conceptual design parameters” (Richard F. Humenn),
stated that “the mass and strength of the structure should have survived the localized damage caused by the planes and burning jet fuel . . . . the fuel and planes alone did not bring the Towers down.”Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering (Dwain A. Deets) says:
“
The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].”
A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E. Jones) stated
that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolitionA U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that
the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that
the trade centers were brought down with explosives (in Danish)
A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that
WTC 7 was implodedA safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki Kurttila)
stated regarding WTC 7 that “The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition.”A 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is
calling for a new investigation of 9/11A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit) said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, “WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don’t have to be a woodcutter to grasp this” (translated)
A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded (Dr. Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers
“were brought down by planted explosives.”A mechanical engineer with 20 years experience as a Fire Protection Engineer for the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense, and Veterans Affairs, who is a contributing Subject Matter Expert to the U.S. Department of Energy Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard for Nuclear Facilities, a board member of the Northern California – Nevada Chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers, currently serving as Fire Protection Engineer for the city of San Jose, California, the 10th largest city in the United States (Edward S. Munyak)
believes that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition.
The former Chief of the Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy, and former Director of the Office of Engineering at the Public Service Commission in Washington, D.C., who is a mechanical engineer (Enver Masud) ,
does not believe the official story, and believes that there is a prima facie case for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.
A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said
“The official explanation that I’ve heard doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized”STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTSA prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see also
this)
Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that,
on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation
here)
Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California
Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California
Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England
Paul W. Mason, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia
Mills M. Kay Mackey, structural engineer, of Denver, Colorado
David Scott, Structural Engineer, of Scotland
Nathan Lomba, Structural Engineer, of Eureka, California
Edward E. Knesl, civil and structural engineer, of Phoenix, Arizona
David Topete, civil and structural engineer, San Francisco, California
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see
this)
Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Michael T. Donly, P.E., structural engineerWilliam Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College
An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use (Richard Gage)
disputes the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition (many other architects who question 9/11 are listed
here)
LEGAL SCHOLARSFormer Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and advocate of international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University (Dr. Francis Boyle)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J. Terrence “Terry” Brunner)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk)
questions the government’s version of 9/11., and
asks whether the Neocons were behind 9/11.
Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (Burns H. Weston)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Former president of the National Lawyers Guild (C. Peter Erlinder), who
signed a petition calling for a real investigation into 9/11. And see
petition.
Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University; associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations; former Federal Sky Marshall; 27-year U.S. Customs career (Mark Conrad)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Professor of Law, University of Freiburg; former Minister of Justice of West Germany (Horst Ehmke)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy; former U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer; author of several books on law and political theory (Dr. William G. Weaver)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Famed trial attorney (Gerry Spence)
questions the government’s version of 9/11.
Former Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley 11-year teaching career. Retired Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County, California 31-year career (William Veale) said:
“When you grow up in the United States, there are some bedrock principles that require concerted effort to discard. One is the simplest: that our leaders are good and decent people whose efforts may occasionally warrant criticism but never because of malice or venality… But one grows up. … And with the lawyer’s training comes the reliance on evidence and the facts that persuade… After a lot of reading, thought, study, and commiseration, I have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government.”FAMILY MEMBERS AND HEROIC FIRST RESPONDERSA common criticism of those who question 9/11 is that they are being “disrespectful to the victims and their families”.
However,
half of the victim’s families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) (and listen to
this interview).
Many family and friends of victims not only
support the search for 9/11 truth, but they
demand it (please ignore the partisan tone). See also
this interview.
Indeed, it has now become so clear that the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash that the same 9/11 widows who called for the creation of the 9/11 Commission are now
demanding a NEW investigation (see also
this video).
And dying heroes, soon-to-be victims themselves, the first responders who worked tirelessly to save lives on and after 9/11, say that
controlled demolition brought down the Twin Towers and that a real investigation is necessary.
PSYCHIATRISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTSFinally, those who attack people who question the government’s version of 9/11 as “crazy” may wish to review the list of mental health professionals who have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false:
Psychiatrist
Carol S. Wolman, MDPsychiatrist
E. Martin SchotzAssociate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center
D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MDBoard of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Ruters University
Barry R. KomisarukProfessor of Psychology at University of New Hampshire
William WoodwardProfessor of Psychology at University of Essex
Philip CozzolinoProfessor of Psychology at Goddard College
Catherine LowtherProfessor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies
Ralph MetznerProfessor of Psychology at Rhodes University
Mike Earl-TaylorRetired Professor of Psychology at Oxford University
Graham HarrisPh.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist
Ronald FeintechPh.D. Clinical Neuropsychologist
Richard WelserTHOUSANDS OF OTHERSThe roster above is only a sample. There are too many Ph.D. scientists and engineers, architects, military and intelligence officials, politicians, legal scholars and other highly-credible people who question 9/11 — literally thousands — to list in one place. Here are a few additional people to consider:
The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh)
says there was a cover up by the 9/11 CommissionFormer air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew “like the back of my hand” and who handled two actual hijackings (Robin Hordon) says
that 9/11 could not have occurred as the government says, and that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off (also, listen to
this interview)
Perhaps
“the premiere collapse expert in the country”, who 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a
“very, very respected expert on building collapse”, the head of the New York Fire Department’s Special Operations Command and the most highly decorated firefighter in its NYFD history, who had previously “commanded rescue operations at many difficult and complex disasters, including the
Oklahoma City Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many natural disasters worldwide” thought that
the collapse of the South Tower was caused by bombs, because the collapse of the building was too even to have been caused by anything else (pages 5-6).
Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly
call for a new investigation into 9/11 Former FBI agent (Robert Wright) says
“The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred.”Former Minnesota Governor (Jesse Ventura)
questions the government’s account of 9/11 and asks whether the World Trade Center was demolishedFormer FBI translator, who
the Department of Justice’s Inspector General and several senators have called extremely credible (free subscription required) (Sibel Edmonds),
said “If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up”. She also is leaning towards the conclusion that
9/11 was an inside job. Some of her allegations have been confirmed in the
British press.
SOURCE:
http://www.911summary.com/*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for
Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America's most listened to late night talk show.
9 11 : The Conspiray Files.
Chicago. Source: Dori
+on_patrol.jpg)
